The First Gay President? (Blog Stage Three)

When it comes to sexual preference and radical politics, Americans as a whole nation are far from accepting.  Recent years, however, have shown a shift towards left-wing politics and a rise of "firsts" in the federal government: the first black president, the first female presidential nominee. Who, then, is to say that Frank Bruni's claims that a gay man may soon be extremely relevant in politics is far-fetched?  In his article in the New York Times, Bruni introduces curious citizens to small-city mayor Pete Buttigieg as an up-and-coming VIP of federal government, with achievements and ideologies combatting those of current office holders in Washington, D.C. 

Considering a topic as controversial as gay rights, it is important to note that the author, Bruni, is himself an openly gay man. While this provides a sense of empathy in his descriptions of mayor Buttigieg's struggles, it is undoubtedly accompanied by bias in favor of Buttigieg's success.  This does not prove in any way that the article is inaccurate or unreliable, although one may note the possibility that tarnishing facts might not be presented with equal prevalence as praise.

The language of the article seems to appeal to patriotic Democrats.  The Democratic party is associated with more liberal thoughts on almost all issues in American politics, and Bruni's mentions of Buttigieg's familiarity with Arabic and his sexual orientation indicate praise for unorthodox skills and characteristics. Bruni also appeals to the nationalism citizens may feel by describing Buttigieg's activities at the baseball game as "all-American" and his explicit commentary on "freedom" in politics.

Bruni's claims that Buttigieg is on his way to becoming a prominent leader in politics is supported by many examples of the mayor's successes.  Two distinctions (J.F.K. New Frontier Award and J.F.K. Profile in Courage Essay Contest) are mentioned for his achievements in public service and a nationwide political essay contest. When asked about problems within the Democratic party, Buttigieg answers by acknowledging the ability of Republicans to openly discuss their thoughts on freedom, whereas Democrats shy away from the term. He emphasizes the importance of negotiating a "deep, personal freedom" that has yet to be discussed accurately in politics. This demonstrates his open-mindedness and political savvy.  He is a Harvard-educated man who served in the Navy Reserve, and played piano for the city's symphony orchestra.  He is portrayed as a well-rounded, level-headed and powerful individual while maintaining a genuine face through his personal struggles.  

The argument Bruni makes suggesting Buttigieg's rise to the top of political importance is supported by the facts and anecdotes that compose the article. Bruni's favor for Buttigieg is obvious; however, the article is still a reliable and well-argued source for citizens to read and ponder.